Einstein-Jung Integrated
For Physicists and Other Intelligent Beings (All Entities)
It is important to notice the analogous, parallel, similar relationship between Einstein's physics and Jung's psychology concepts. To get the 'big picture' or the ah-ha moment, ignore the individual words and notice the similar relationship(s) between them. This is the process of integration (via/identified by Jung):
- Ancient Reality: Fire, Water, Air, Earth
- Einstein Reality: Energy, Mass, Light, Constant
- Jung Reality: Active, Passive, Conscious, Unconscious
We can add:
- Present Reality: Light, Sound, Space, Time
- Physical Reality: Energy, Mass, Substance, Form
- Practical Reality: Movement, Substance, Opposites, Symbols
- General Reality: Showing, Hidden, Concrete, Abstract
- Symbolic Reality: Day, Night, Earth, Heaven
And then:
- Psychological Reality: Intuition, Emotion, Intellect, Behavior
And also:
- Artistic Reality: Circle, Line, Triangle, Square
- Musical Reality: Unison, Octave, Minor, Major
To get to:
- Conserved Reality: Conservation, Symmetry, Circle, Diameter
- Circular (Formal) Reality: Circle, Diameter, Line, Pi
And-or:
- Space: Sound, Circular, Enclosed, Still
- Time: Light, Linear, Open, Moving
The above articulates, and proves, (if you decide to 'see' it), there is a correspondence (underlying unity) between and among our word relationships (symbols). We try, in physics, science in general, and otherwise, to articulate an overall process-entity comprised of one, two, three and four parts. Normally we view these parts, entities, processes, separately, or distinctly, and linearly (energy-mass-light-constant); however we can also view them as a continuum, and in an indestructible, constant, circular relationship (circle), the four, together, and in any combination (because any two entities are joined by a circle and its diameter whether we choose to acknowledge it or not). Our articulation schemes, because they are created by us, mean something only to us. Hierarchy, as we normally deploy it, building from small to large, or based on observed 'difference' is a linear phenomenon and that is its major shortfall and the subject and benefit of the circular idea. We are, by leaving out the circle, leaving out an important reality for the process-entity we are attempting to describe. We must begin to notice it is time to integrate all of our separate ideas and systems with a circle (in and as science, not only-just philosophy). Anything linear MUST BE circular as well (light must eventually be sound; evolution and other linear processes MUST ALWAYS occur simultaneously in both directions, again, resulting in light and sound, and light and sound are, obviously, nothing more, or less, than line and circle, eternally joined).
When we try to understand or analyze anything independent of its associations or relationships, we remove the proper context (circle) which is why we have, up to this time, been unable (or maybe unwilling) to arrive at a unification theory, idea, or reality. Science is observing and framing based on linear sight alone (leaving out circular sound, altogether) which gives us partial answers, incomplete because of the way we 'order,' and 'separate,' always based on a linear hierarchy. We are, perhaps, more comfortable with a separate, ordered, linear, hierarchical framework because, again, perhaps, it makes us feel more comfortable (or safe). Or maybe we are stuck in a linear hierarchy (triangle) because it has been handed down historically and we are trained to think this way (based on historical fear and reverence of the apparently large and powerful sun). Also, the circular idea has been eliminated from our intellectual processes. Since Aristotle, we have been banished from the circular question, thought, answer (not that long ago, really, only 2400 years which is a mere droplet unnoticeable, truly, in the bucket of time we are attempting to articulate).
But, because, and especially because, they are a continuum, eventually, day is night, energy is mass, light is sound, magnetism is electricity, substance is movement, entity is process and space is time, and, always, all of these, vice versa; also circular is linear, circumference is diameter, because this is, obviously, the basis or foundation, so it is very easy to see we should, can, and will (some already have) re-introduce the circular idea and process into our intellectual analyses (in all disciplines, but, especially, and most importantly, science). Continuous relationships mean everything is true at the point where they are both the same (where null=infinity, nothing=something, true=false, which takes us to pi and the universe of symbols and form where the line is a circle because it is both circumference and diameter; all entities begin with, and within, this symbolic entity, pi, and are, therefore, eternally joined, or integrated, by it; pi is the conservation guarantee and reference point for reality, substance, movement, observation, frame, relationship in general, and, especially, gravity, unification, and, eventually, integration).
Frame - Framed - Framing - Observer - Observed
We realize and understand that frame is important, and perhaps we cannot escape framing too small a frame because 'we' are doing the framing; or, better, perhaps science, and all other disciplines, is-are attempting to answer this question: are we, in general, framed (in a closed system) or not (open system). Clearly the circle-line relationship answers this question and removes the frame problem/error. Frame and framed, observation and observer, are open and closed at the same time. Because of this, is-not always is-is, in some eventual (time or space) framework, and the circular analysis, reality or idea is essential if we truly want answers. (Light is the basic frame for time; sound is the basic frame for space; these are related via the line-circle-conservation-symmetry relationship-circle.).
Jung identified an opposite (psychological) process or dichotomy with the following pairs (archetypes) to describe personality: extroverted (active), introverted (passive), sensing (outside-in), intuitive (inside-out), intellectual (linear), emotional (circular). He also identified, or articulated, a shadow process, whereby one member of the pair hides the other and over time both sides of the pair make a 'showing' in a relationship or personality. Einstein's energy, mass, light, can be thought of, symbolically, or correspondingly, as extroverted-introverted, intuitive-sensing, intellectual-emotional, or linear and circular, energy-mass, form-subsance, one showing, the other hidden in a shadow, or one abstract, the other concrete. Any entity is, then, at least, two entities at apparently, and supposedly, different speeds. (One of us is always at least two of us, one slow the other fast, or one big the other small, or one abstract, the other concrete, one hidden, the other showing, or any other pair we can name. This means we share a single intelligence or mind even as we experience a supposedly separate reality. It also means all entities, independent of frame, animate or inanimate, visible or invisible, share the same intelligence, reality, future-past-present.)
Words (symbols) and organization (frames) are arbitrary and these keep us away from the truth; what we are really seeing above is the relationship between zero, one, two, and three, or one, two, three and four (or circle, line, triangle, square). All of these reduce to the relationship between one and two or circle and line (conservation and symmetry, substance and movement, entity and substance) because it is not possible to have any entity alone; all entities, including the circle, are comprised of at least two entities; abstract, or concrete, hidden or showing, and this must always mean an infinite, and then a null, amount of entities...together, always, and to infinity...of course). It is a very big mistake to think we can have abstract without concrete and vice versa, hidden without showing and vice versa, and-or infinite without null and vice versa (no single big bangs ever; always multiple, and always implosion and explosion at the same time and space).
EInstein's energy and mass are related via a circle and Jung's active and passive (conscious and unconscious) are related via the same circle. Any two entities, or people, are related via the circle. This is a mathematical, and also a physical, fact. (Fire and water are symbolic words and also physical realities for light and sound, which are symbolic realities for line and circle). We cannot leave out the circle or else all of our ideas are incorrect (at least fifty percent of the time, and space).
So any two words will create a system of three words, and then four. Because all words and systems are bound (and integrated) by the circle. This means, obviously, and apparently, we are, and we live in, an ultra-creative medium which is why we cannot stop ourselves from continuing to create more and more symbols and symbolic systems; this will not stop or go away. There is no 'no' point without a 'yes' point. So forget about one universe, or a single big bang. If there is one, then there will always be multiple. Billions upon billions of symbols which means billions upon billions of entities, billions upon billions of big bangs (sex), and billions upon billions or realities or dimensions or universes. This can NEVER end (obviously, if you decide to 'see' it). Science, history, humanity is extremely young, immature, naive; we're doing the best we can; but, truly, we have had VERY LITTLE TIME to think about the reality we are trying to articulate; and our number systems, all of them, are far too small (and large), limited (unlimited), segregated (joined), because they are based on the idea one can never be two and one and or two can never be three. This is why we are not getting to the answer.
All circles are comprised of diameters, and, therefore, all entities are comprised of at least two pairs. We have overlooked this important fact because we usually think of circles in terms of 'center.' To keep the circle a 'one' entity, we think of its center, or the circle as a center. However a closer examination of the circle reveals there is no 'center' because the circle is continually moving, or arbitrary, according to where the circler (observer) decides to place it (circle), and a circle, after all, encloses nothing, or pure space-no center. This takes us to its diameter, instead of its center or radius, which gives us a clearer description, or articulation, of reality. Any point anywhere is, because of the circle, two points, one diametric and the other circumferential, to another point. This explains expansion-entropy, gravity, and dimension. It also untangles observer-observed, frame-framed-framer,
It also explains, easily, why we are finding 96% 'nothing' in the 'universe'; all the mass, because of the circle, must reduce to 3.14 which, from the circle's point of view is either three or four, so, the more correct analysis says, 3 or 4% matter-something, 96 or 97% mind-nothing (and ALWAYS vice versa so watch out...). We can call this dark energy, dark matter, light energy, light matter, deep space, deep time, shallow space, shallow time; whatever we name it will (must) produce the opposite name, idea, entity. There is a circle of 'stuff,' 3.14%, 3% or 4%, and then all the rest non-circle, linear, movement, etc. and vice versa. The 'circle of stuff does not have to be in a physical circle (this is the tricky part- circumferences and diameters can be disconnected, yet still related, which is why we have light and sound).
The human circle continues as do every species of circles. Eternally. At some point, though, we turn up as universes; at another quarks, another, DNA; at another, even now, as grains of sand on a beach; all the same circle of circles, all 'universes' in their own, separate, and integrated, reality; all integrated realities nothing more, or less, then a set of opposite pairs. We need only, easily, to recognize, we are the same, though different, as any other universe, large, or small, and we can understand all movement and substance by observing our movement, alone; always back and forth, in a line, which is ultimately a circle. We survive, and reproduce, back and forth, in a line, and, then, as soon as we are ready to notice, in a very obvious circle.
Proof? The circle does not have to be proven (although, truly, it is simple/obvious to see it at work all around us). We figured it out long ago via deduction which is far more powerful than visible proof (which completely ignores or leaves out the essentially important and necessary SOUND). Statistics, are one way to look at a circle; unfortunately, as others have shown, we are throwing away the most important information when we eliminate outliers. This is a very deep, and perhaps the most important, observation. So, here we are, again: The circle is the underlying process, form, AND entity. We are now ready to introduce, include, and embrace, it into our intellectual analyses processes. We are ready, at last, and first, to begin, or end, our journey in earnest. You, as reader, observer, framer, participant, circler, scientist, philosopher, psychologist, person, particle, universe, hold the key, since only you can decide what is true for you. Conservation of the Circle is the basis for reality.
Contact Ilexa Yardley to schedule a lecture, study-group, workshop, personal or organizational consultation, on Conservation of the Circle so you can incorporate it into your work, organization, discipline. This is the most important action you can take for yourself, your organization, and, most importantly, humanity. The circle is now and here which takes us to then and there, linearly, then, of course, now, circularly. If you are in your twenties, this is the most important action you will take in your lifetime. Young people must define our future (present) reality, independent of, but also along side of, the generations ahead of (behind) them. If you are mid-career, these ideas can get you to break-through thinking, helping you to make a more productive, and meaningful contribution. If you are a senior professional, these ideas will help you to re-frame, and re-articulate, the ideas you now understand, after a life-time of observation, framing, understanding, and, finally wisdom. We are truly at an integration-unification-singularization point which has produced, already, via the circular-theory, which you are, just now, reading, an improved, complete, and more in-depth awareness (and analyses). (Continue here...)