Infinite Observer
Ilexa Yardley 19 November 2009
Observation is an idea we take for granted in science. That is, without an observation there is no science.
Observation is also an idea we take for granted in philosophy (religion), and also in psychology. That is, without an observation there is no philosophy (religion), and also no psychology.
So what is observation?
To have an observation we must assume observer. That is, an observer makes an observation.
Observation is normally thought of as a visual assessment of some kind, but observation can also be thought of more broadly. So, here, we take observation to mean any connection between X and Y.
To have an observer we must assume observation. This is not obvious. Observer observing, noun verb, is normally thought to be active, not passive.
That is, we normally think of observation in one direction (the observer observes observation however not vice versa). That is, subject is not object.
So the first step in untangling observation is to realize an observation and its observer are in a circular relationship (mandatory). This is because the line is always a diameter of a circle. So, if there is a linear relationship between observer and observation, there must also be a circular relationship between them.
This tiny adjustment, from linear to circular, changes all of our ideas about observation.
Can we separate an observer from his, her or its observation? If the observation is also an observer, perhaps, we cannot. This observation, the separation of observer and observation, must be made by an observation (an observer). So separation is, itself, an observation, and thus an observer.
Background and foreground may shed light on observation, but, again, perhaps not. Background and foreground, as observer and observation, because they are in a circular relationship (as well as linear), may not, (can not) always be separate.
That is, the, or an, observer separates background from foreground. Be careful with this, though. Since background and foreground must share a circular (as well as linear) relationship, background can be foreground and many illusions depend on this fact as their reality.
We can think of a linear relationship as one-directional and a circular relationship as bi-directional. This is not mandatory, however, since circular and-or linear can both be one or multiple-directional. The circular-linear relationship between any X and Y gives the observer (observation) its power.
That is, the observer must determine whether or not there is a singular or multiple directional relationship between any two any-things (every two every-things). The observer can mix and match because only the observer can decide on his-her-its observation (even though the observation is making this same decision).
We can see a one-two-three relationship between observer, background and foreground (observer-observation).
That is, we must begin by noticing there is no separation at all between any background and-or foreground. Background and foreground are convenient ideas we use to understand reality. So right off the bat, as observers, we create (live in, with) two realities.
One reality is joined and the other is separated. An observer and an observation join and-or separate reality (one reality from another).
To make this simple (clear) we can visualize an observer connected to his background (he must be or else he can not ‘know’ it). The observer, in this observation, is foreground to his-her-its background. This makes his-her-its reality a two-state system. Observer and observation, in a two-state system, must be separated by a line and a circle. So in this way line and circle (line or circle) is observer (and observation).
Since line and circle are separate (ideas) then line and circle are also separated (and joined) by line and circle. So reality, in this view, is line and circle (everything else is irrelevant, not present).
Therefore, observer and observation are line and circle. One plays foreground, the other background, and this is found in any pair, related or not (because there must be a line and circle between any two any-things (every two every-things).
So what is line and circle? Or, we must understand line and circle if we want to understand background and foreground, observer and observation. Since, really, line and circle are the only observers separating any background and foreground.
This line-circle (reality) produces all the other relationship (realistic) ideas: gravity, opposition, movement, dimension, reproduction, absolute, relative, infinite, abstract, concrete, hidden, showing. All of these words are alternate words for observation (observer). So, therefore, all of these words are alternate words for circle (line).
Circles occur in lines and lines occur in circles and circles occur in circles and lines occur in lines. This reality (observation) produces gravity, opposition, movement, dimension, reproduction, absolute, relative, infinite, abstract, concrete, hidden, showing, or any other word you can think of (create, observe).
The word (symbol) is an observation. Thus it is also an observer. Symbol as observer produces relative observer(s) (observation)(s). Circle (line), then, is the basis for symbol (observation).
Circle (pi), then, is the only observer (connection-separation between any two any-things, every two every-things).
Infinite observer (observation).