What is Unification?
Ilexa Yardley 24 November 2009
When we decide, as observers, to discover, or observe, unification as (a, the) basis (outcome) for reality, we are deciding to observe (a, the) one entity that is multiple (all) entities.
We are also deciding to observe (a, the) one process that is multiple (all) processes. And, we are also deciding to observe (an, the) entity that is also (a, the) process, and-or (a, the) process that is also (an, the) entity. (Where ‘a’ equals ‘the.’)
As corollary observations, we are also deciding to observe subject is object, object is subject, future is past, past is future, local is not local, not local is local. Some will recognize (observe) these observations as (a form of, the basis for) complementarity.
Unification means one. So to find a one that is the one, or, the only ‘one,’ we must first decide to observe one. If many is one (one is many) we have reached (observed) unification.
We might say mathematics is a sophisticated symbolic system for observing one. The various symbols in mathematics are all manipulations of one, in one way, or another. So, symbolically, mathematics illustrates the problem we wish to solve via unification.
So if we say (observe) that all symbols within mathematics, existing, and to be created, are equal and equivalent, we have reached unification.
Further, if we say (observe) the symbol set of mathematics is a proxy for any symbol set, language, pictures, musical notation, the race of humans, as examples, and we apply the same strategy, that is, if we decide to observe one symbol set is the same as another, in that any of the individual symbols within the symbol set is equal and equivalent to each of the others, we have also reached unification.
To be more specific, or to use scientific notation, a unification observation means any X is Y. Or, X = Y.
However, this is not enough, even though it is important to mention equal and not equal are equivalent (and equal) to X and Y, so, therefore, they are equal (equivalent, and also not equal). (if X = Y, == ≠)
What we are really saying, above, is any symbol (and man, animal, plant is also symbol), if it is different from any other symbol, must also be the same.
We take this as an assumption when we decide to ‘look for’ unification. (Observe in the future tense).
Using the word observe as a symbol, adding to it observed (past), will observe (future), observing (present), we can make all of these equal and equivalent in our unification scheme or system (observation).
But what we are really after is “what would make them (possibly, probably, actually) equal or equivalent?”
The answer is much simpler than it might seem.
There is an invisible line and circle, where the imaginary line is the required (mandatory) diameter of the imaginary circle, between any two symbols (any two any-things, every two every-things).
This invisible line and circle is also present between any symbol and the reality (if there is such a thing) it represents. The line and circle are, in one sense, a symbol for symbols.
So the line and circle (symbols) provide (produce) unification.
That is, the line and circle, as a base dual symbol set, that are unified (in geometry, mathematics, reality) via circumference, diameter and pi, are present as (within, by, for) any symbol set, and also the individual members (no matter what they are) of any symbol set.
This line and circle actually make up any symbol, and or symbol set. (Numbers, words, pictures, entities and processes have shape which reduce or expand into lines and curves which can be directly or indirectly observed).
The line and circle are a symbol for any two symbols, which eventually become more than one symbol, because they originate, or occur, or can be observed, at one time or another, in one space or another, as one symbol. Put another way, a line is also a curve, and vice versa. (A line can be straight or curvy, but it is still a line.)
Once we notice the line must be the diameter of a circle, we can eliminate it. Or, once we notice the circle must be a circumference of a line, we can eliminate it. By eliminating it, we have not really eliminated it. Eliminating one or the other, however, is what we need to do to reach unification.
That is, we must decide to observe, every thing is in a circle with the circle, even (and especially) the line. (Or, complementarily, everything is in a line with the line, even (and especially) the circle.
Further, we must observe that circle (line) is both noun and verb. And, also, that circle circling, or circle and circling, are the same thing. If we decide to do this, we have unified all entities and processes (and the symbols and symbol sets we use to represent these).
Circle and line are mandatorily (infinitely, absolutely, relatively) unified as pi, circumference, diameter.
If we slow down, we can notice any process is a cycle of some kind, and, thus, a circle (circling). We can also notice any entity is an enclosure of some kind, and, thus a circle (circled). Survival (circled) and reproduction (circling) are obvious circles in a circle with each other (the basis or reality of all entities and processes).
A house, for example, is, realistically, a circle (it encloses space so we can experience temporary safety). And we are a circle within it (a circle within a circle, or, a circle of circles).
The building of the house is circling (to make the circle). Multiple houses make a circle (house and housing are circles). Families are circles, as are universities, countries, markets, etc. All of us circle to be in circles, so we can be circled.
Any action, as X to Y, produces a line which must be the diameter of a circle (producing an infinite number of lines and circles which reduce or explode into one line and-or one circle). (See a scatter diagram generated from a particle accelerator to observe this.)
Not everyone wishes to unify in the same way, however. Unification mandates its opposite (complementarity via circle and line). So, to have unification you must also have non-unification (which is what we have as, or in, reality).
We cannot expect, or insist, that all men (or entities, or processes) will embrace ‘circle’ as unifier. If circle is unifier, by its existence, half must use some other word or idea or symbol to unify (or not).
Or, put another way, what one person calls circle, another must call line, and still another must call god, and another allah, and another yahweh, and another buddha and another vishna, and another krishna, and another ‘one,’ and another whole, and another duality, and another trinity, and another nature, and another life, and another intelligence, and another energy, and another waveform, and another string, and another Higgs boson, etc.
Once we have two, we are stuck with ‘many,’ and this, of course, is what we see in reality (or what we are used to calling reality, again, if there is such a thing).
There is no end to what one may (decide to) call (observe as) one. This explains why within physics, for example, we have reached two major theories as possible unification candidates. It also explains why science is exploding with ideas (and branches of science) and mathematics is exploding with equations (and branches of mathematics) and journals are exploding with symbols. To have one, we must have many, and this comes from the one is two reality of circle.
Others may prefer to call the unifier system. That is, any entity or process can be observed as system.
There is a system between any X and Y. There is also a relationship, opposition, gravity, movement, force, between any X and Y. But all of these are possible because of circle (or line). All of these are alternate words for circle, and, thus, once an observer decides to unify, alternate words for each other (gravity is movement is opposition is force is circle is line etc).
So, with circle (and mandatory line) we have found (may find) unification.
Only, however, if we decide to observe so.
Closer observation reveals, because there is a mandatory circle (and line) between any X and Y (and, therefore every X and Y), pi is the only observer. (Pi must exist in order for any symbol to exist).
We are observing, as pi is observing, and pi has already made the circular observation (we must catch up).
Symbols, in a circle with us, produce a reason for us (we reproduce them so they can survive and they reproduce us so we can survive), both possible (and probable) via circle. That is, pi, as it holds any diameter and circumference together, as a symbol, and also a reality, is the reason, and the mechanism, for (as) unification.
Pi joins us all together (separates us from one another). Pi is unification and whatever is its opposite.
Unification requires two to make one (complementarity). That is, the opposite is a (general and very specific) symbol, which, when observed carefully, must be a circle (which must be a line).
Any line, as a connection between two, and then three, and then more, or many, must be the diameter of a circle.
The circle is in a circular (and linear) relationship with any entity (process, system, symbol). This is the unification idea we were (are) seeking and now have found. (To seek and then find is a complementary circle, we cannot have one without the other.)
Unification (observation) (the circle), then, joins (separates) past and future into present. Pi, as the only observer (unifier), joins past and future into present. Pi produces (is) unification.
This (pi) is a wonderful observation (discovery, insight): there is a mandatory three to make two to make one (three is two is one). This is, in essence, unification.